<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02312nam a2200229Ia 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">675</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">675</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="001">0002526</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20190325123214.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170602s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9780199461158</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="028" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="q">2016</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">RBSA, Jaipur</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">English</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BSDU</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">BSDU</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">338.154 </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">SHA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Shariff, Abusaleh</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Institutionalizing constitutional Rights : Post-Sachar Committee Scenario</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield>
    <subfield code="a"> New Delhi</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2016</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">483</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Political discourse in India experienced a fundamental shift when the Schar Committee Report revealed that despite the national and state government policies and programmes, the Muslim community was among the most deprived and backward, worse off than the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, in most of the outcome indicators.
Many new pro-poor and inclusive policies were introduced as a response to the recommendations of the report. This book makes a critical assessment of the impact of 'post-Sachar' policies, bridging the gaps in empirical measurements and analytical documentation, and making them accessible to the public at large.
The book recommends policies and institutions required for ensuring the constitutional right to equal opportunity for all Indian citizens, especially minorities, such as setting  up of an Equal Opportunity Commission and systematically computing a diversity index  to improve the process of assimilation of the deprived groups, including the minorities, into the national mainstream.
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Contents :
1. Introduction
    I Education ,Employment,Economy and Human Development
2. Demographics of Education Levels and Type
3.Economy and Employment
4.Social Structure,Driversity and Economic Growth
5.Monitoring Equal Opportunity through Human Development Index
     II Critical Analysis of Inclusive Policies
6.Critical Analysis of the Programmes of the Ministry of Miniority Affairs
7.DEvelopment Credit and Financial Inclusion
8.Special Purpose Programmes and Public Institutions Favouring Minorities
9.A Case Study of Inclusive Development of Gujrat
10.Equitable Social and Economic Development in India : Recommendations on Institution-Building and Policies

</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Political Science</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">BK</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">REF</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BSDU</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BSDU</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2016-12-14</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">1195.00</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">338.154  SHA</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">002526</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2020-02-12 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">1195.00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2017-06-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">BK</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
